Lab Home | Phone | Search
Center for Nonlinear Studies  Center for Nonlinear Studies
 Home 
 People 
 Current 
 Affiliates 
 Visitors 
 Students 
 Research 
 ICAM-LANL 
 Publications 
 Conferences 
 Workshops 
 Sponsorship 
 Talks 
 Colloquia 
 Colloquia Archive 
 Seminars 
 Postdoc Seminars Archive 
 Quantum Lunch 
 Quantum Lunch Archive 
 CMS Colloquia 
 Q-Mat Seminars 
 Q-Mat Seminars Archive 
 P/T Colloquia 
 Archive 
 Kac Lectures 
 Kac Fellows 
 Dist. Quant. Lecture 
 Ulam Scholar 
 Colloquia 
 
 Jobs 
 Postdocs 
 CNLS Fellowship Application 
 Students 
 Student Program 
 Visitors 
 Description 
 Past Visitors 
 Services 
 General 
 
 History of CNLS 
 
 Maps, Directions 
 CNLS Office 
 T-Division 
 LANL 
 
Thursday, November 13, 2014
11:00 AM - 12:00 PM
CNLS Conference Room (TA-3, Bldg 1690)

Seminar

Transitioning implicit solvation models from the ground to the excited state

Giovanni Scalmani
Gaussian, Inc.

Solvent effects are a crucial component of any ab initio protocol that aims to a direct comparison between theory and experiment. Molecular energies, structures and properties are often affected in a significant way by the solvent or – more in general – by the microscopic environment. Implicit models represent an inexpensive yet accurate way to account for solvent effects as they do not require an atomistic description of the solvent itself.

The Polarizable Continuum Model (PCM) is a well established implicit solvent model that has been successfully used to compute ground state energies and structures, using many different classical and quantum methods. Solvent effects on a variety of spectroscopic properties have also been described using PCM. Despite its apparent simplicity, a state of the art implementation of PCM is far from simple and many crucial aspects of the model, which are now hidden “under the hood”, took many years of development to reach the present form.

Today, one of the most challenging applications of PCM is the description of excited states in solution. Multiple approaches to the problem have been proposed, but despite their individual merits and success stories, they appear to be incompatible with one another. Moreover, all these methods have serious shortcomings which effectively prevent their use to study excited states dynamics.

Host: Josiah Bjorgaard