Lab Home | Phone | Search
Center for Nonlinear Studies  Center for Nonlinear Studies
 Home 
 People 
 Current 
 Affiliates 
 Alumni 
 Visitors 
 Students 
 Research 
 ICAM-LANL 
 Quantum 
 Publications 
 Publications 
 2007 
 2006 
 2005 
 2004 
 2003 
 2002 
 2001 
 2000 
 <1999 
 Conferences 
 Workshops 
 Sponsorship 
 Talks 
 Colloquia 
 Colloquia Archive 
 Seminars 
 Postdoc Seminars Archive 
 Quantum Lunch 
 CMS Colloquia 
 Q-Mat Seminars 
 Q-Mat Seminars Archive 
 Archive 
 Kac Lectures 
 Dist. Quant. Lecture 
 Ulam Scholar 
 Colloquia 
 
 Jobs 
 Students 
 Summer Research 
 Student Application 
 Visitors 
 Description 
 Past Visitors 
 Services 
 General 
 PD Travel Request 
 
 History of CNLS 
 
 Maps, Directions 
 CNLS Office 
 T-Division 
 LANL 
 
Thursday, July 19, 2012
2:00 PM - 3:00 PM
CNLS Conference Room (TA-3, Bldg 1690)

Postdoc Seminar

Temporal clustering of great earthquakes

Eric Daub
EES-17: GEOPHYSICS

The last decade has seen a surge in the number of great earthquakes (magnitude M ≥ 8), including three of the six largest events on record in the past century. These events have prompted speculation that large events cluster in time on a global scale, implying that global seismic hazard is currently elevated. Recent studies have addressed this question by applying several statistical tests that compare the earthquake catalog to a process that is random in time (i.e. event times are uncorrelated). These studies show that the earthquake data does not deviate from a random process -- it does not support earthquake clustering. Here we study the statistics of recurrence times between earthquakes, using the standard measure for fluctuations, the variance. At most magnitude ranges, the data is within the variability expected for a random process. However, we find evidence for a deviation from a random process among earthquakes above magnitude 8.4-8.5 after removing aftershocks, which are known to cluster spatially and temporally near an earthquake. If we only consider data since 1950, when instrumentation worldwide improved significantly and event magnitudes become better constrained, the likelihood that the earthquake catalog is random becomes remarkably small (~1/1000). We attribute the nonrandom behavior to clustering of large earthquakes, as there are two clusters of events (one in the 1950s-1960s, and one from 2004-present) separated by a long period with no events. Our results have an impact on the way seismic hazard is estimated worldwide, suggesting the need to incorporate both local strain accumulation and large event interactions.

Host: Kipton Barros, T-4 and CNLS