Lab Home | Phone | Search
Center for Nonlinear Studies  Center for Nonlinear Studies
 Home 
 People 
 Current 
 Affiliates 
 Visitors 
 Students 
 Research 
 ICAM-LANL 
 Publications 
 Conferences 
 Workshops 
 Sponsorship 
 Talks 
 Colloquia 
 Colloquia Archive 
 Seminars 
 Postdoc Seminars Archive 
 Quantum Lunch 
 Quantum Lunch Archive 
 CMS Colloquia 
 Q-Mat Seminars 
 Q-Mat Seminars Archive 
 P/T Colloquia 
 Archive 
 Kac Lectures 
 Kac Fellows 
 Dist. Quant. Lecture 
 Ulam Scholar 
 Colloquia 
 
 Jobs 
 Postdocs 
 CNLS Fellowship Application 
 Students 
 Student Program 
 Visitors 
 Description 
 Past Visitors 
 Services 
 General 
 
 History of CNLS 
 
 Maps, Directions 
 CNLS Office 
 T-Division 
 LANL 
 
Thursday, January 03, 2013
1:00 PM - 2:00 PM
CNLS Conference Room (TA-3, Bldg 1690)

Seminar

Methods to Compare Bacterial Genomes - with special emphasis on AT content

Dave Ussery
The Technical University of Denmark

In 1995, two bacterial genomes were published, and starting with these two genomes, comparative genomics was possible. Now, at the end of 2012, there are roughly 20,000 bacterial genomes that are publicly available to compare, and the cost of sequencing a bacterial genome is continuing to become more economical. There is hope that with 'third generation sequencing', it will be possible to get high-quality finished bacterial genome sequences in a few minutes. Dealing with too much data can be a daunting task. There are many methods to compare bacterial genomes, including simple statistics of quantities such as genome size, number of protein-encoding genes, rRNA operons, tRNAs, etc. More complicated methods can compare sets of conserved core-genes and the collection of all genes (the 'pan-genome') for a given set of genomes, as well as predicted metabolic properties. The AT content of a genome can vary along the chromosome, and for more than 2000 complete bacterial genomes studied, the intergenic regions are consistently about 5% more AT rich, regardless of the %AT of the genome. Further, A's (and G's) tend to be bias towards the replication leading strand in Gram positives, whilst the A's (but not G's) are bias towards the lagging strain in Gram negatives. Finally, it is possible, based on a genome sequence, to make an educated guess as to the taxonomy of the organism, and currently methods are being developed for high-throughput genome-based molecular typing of bacterial genomes.

Host: Brian Foley, T-6 btf@lanl.gov