Lab Home | Phone | Search
Center for Nonlinear Studies  Center for Nonlinear Studies
 Home 
 People 
 Current 
 Affiliates 
 Alumni 
 Visitors 
 Students 
 Research 
 ICAM-LANL 
 Publications 
 2007 
 2006 
 2005 
 2004 
 2003 
 2002 
 2001 
 2000 
 <1999 
 Conferences 
 Workshops 
 Sponsorship 
 Talks 
 Colloquia 
 Seminars 
 Quantum Lunch 
 CMS Colloquia 
 Archive 
 Kac Lectures 
 Dist. Quant. Lecture 
 Ulam Scholar 
 Colloquia 
 
 Jobs 
 Students 
 Summer Research 
 Graduate Positions 
 Visitors 
 Description 
 Services 
 General 
 PD Travel Request 
 
 History of CNLS 
 
 Maps, Directions 
 CNLS Office 
 T-Division 
 LANL 
 
Monday, October 23, 2006
10:00 AM - 11:00 AM
CNLS Conference Room (TA-3, Bldg 1690)

Seminar

On the improvement of the swept region remapper in 2D and 3D - Auto-intersection and corner flux cures

Raphael Loubere
University of Toulouse, CNRS

In most ALE numerical methods, a Lagrangian mesh is rezoned into a geometrically better mesh, then a conservative remapper (otherwise called projector) transfers the information from the Lagrangian mesh onto the rezoned one. In this work one considers the swept region remapper with no-connectivity change obtained by considering the region [AA'B'B] swept by one edge [AB] shared by cell 1 and 2. (Points A', B' are the rezoned locations of point A, B.) This swept region is associated with a donor cell (1 or 2) depending on the sign of the swept region. One then integrated the density field over the swept region to construct a mass flux between cell 1 and 2 due to the rezone process. Such a remapper has the huge advantage of being very simple, conservative by construction, working with general polygonal mesh and being extensible to 3D. However the two main drawbacks are: (A) mass flux is performed only across an edge: no mass flux does exist between two cells sharing only one vertex; (B) auto-intersection as it happens when the quadrangles [AA'B'B] is tangled is not well taken into account as the swept region is not correctly approximated in this case. We will present a cure to these drawbacks, keeping in mind two important points: -first, any improvement must be extensible in 3D, -second, direct calculation of intersection points/lines in 2D/3D must be avoided (as it is difficult/impossible to perform in general in 3D). Theoretical and numerical results will be presented.

Host: Mikhail Shashkov